Legal Opinion
Bank of Tarboro v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 28, 1901PublishedCited by 27 opinions
ActioN by tbe Bank of Tarboro against the Fidelity and Deposit Company, of Maryland, heard by Judge A. L. Goble and a jury at Fall Term, 1900, of the Superior Court of Edgecombe County. From a judgment for the plaintiff, ihe defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
This case has been here before, and is reported in 126 N. C., 320. As far as that decision goes, it will be considered as final in the determination of this case.
The following are the issues as submitted and answered:
“1. Did Mehegan, as cashier and while in the performance of the duties of his office, between December 15, 1895, and September 3, 1897, fraudulently take from the assets and money of plaintiff bank the sum of $5,000.00, and on May 27, 1897, for the purpose of concealing his fraudulent conduct, charge said amount to the City National Bank of Norfolk on the books of the plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Travellers' Insurance v. McConkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- London Assurance v. Companhia De Moagens Do BarreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- McCain v. Hartford Live Stock InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- United American Fire Insurance Co. v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Title & Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Manufacturers Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1959
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.