Legal Opinion

Certified Blood Donor Services, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 3, 1974No. C. D. 4509; Court 68/54415-21133-68PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Judge:

We are faced with a case, conceptually technical, concerning the dutiable status of certain rabbit antisera imported by plaintiff from West Germany in 1968. The merchandise was assessed with duty at the rate of 9 per .centum ad valorem under the provision in item 799.00 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) for “Other” articles not provided for elsewhere in the tariff schedules. Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is free of duty under the provision in item 437.76, TSUS, for “Viruses, therapeutic serums, vaccines, toxins, anti-toxins, and analogous biological…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tanross Supply Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Lyons Export & Import, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. American Bristle & Hair Drawing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  4. United States v. 23 7/12 Dozen Bottles, 35-Cent Size, & 12⅔ Dozen Bottles, 70-Cent Size, of an Article of Drugs Labeled in Part "Lee's Save the Baby"District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
  5. Maxine Blank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Certified Blood Donor Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  2. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API