Legal Opinion

Krupp v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1943No. Civ. No. 13855; Civ. No. 13856PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (W. J.), J.

An action was commenced by Ruth Coriene and her husband to recover damages for injuries suffered, by Mrs. Coriene when an automobile in which she was riding as a guest passenger was struck by a streetcar operated by defendant Crow and owned by defendant Los Angeles Railway Corporation. A separate action was commenced by Esther F. Krupp to recover for injuries suffered in the same accident, she also having been a guest passenger in the same automobile. The actions were consolidated for trial, resulting in a verdict for defendants. Plaintiffs have appealed from the ensuing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Renowden v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Crutchfield v. Davidson Brick Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Chapman v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miller v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Martindale v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Raliway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Lund v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Britton v. GundersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Fletcher v. PierceallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API