Legal Opinion

Davis v. O'Bryant

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1899No. 2,928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Erom the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, J. —

Suit by appellees upon an' appeal bond. In the body of the bond appear the names of three obligors, and only two of them signed it. The complaint shows the bond was filed and duly approved and the appeal taken. A complaint against those who did sign it, although a third obligor is named in the bond, is good against a demurrer for want of facts. The fact that a part of the persons named executed it, and part did not, is not ground for demurrer for want of facts, but must be pleaded as a defense. There is nothing on the face of the bond to show it was a conditional delivery, but…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Deardorff v. ForesmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Markland Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. KimmelIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Fletcher v. AustinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
  4. Wild Cat Branch v. BallIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. United States v. Brig Union, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1808

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kruse Classic Auction Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Husak v. CliffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API