Legal Opinion

United States v. Jan E. True Fred B. Roth Thomas E. O'Dell Timothy D. Moran Barry M. Geiken

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 7, 1991No. 90-30067Published

1Opinion of the Court

946 F.2d 682

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Jan E. TRUE; Fred B. Roth; Thomas E. O'Dell; Timothy D.

Moran; Barry M. Geiken, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 90-30067.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Sept. 10, 1990.

Decided Oct. 7, 1991.

David Atkin, Eugene, Or., for defendants-appellants.

Jim Kauble, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.

Before CANBY and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and LEGGE,* District Judge.

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

1

Jan True and four other individuals appeal…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Catholic BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. Arnold GemmillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API