Legal Opinion

(HC) Bisel v. Fisher

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 17, 2022No. 1:17-cv-00013Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY EUGENE BISEL, No. 1:17-cv-00013-DAD-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PETITION FOR WRIT OF 13 v. HABEAS CORPUS 14 RAY FISHER, JR., [THIRTY DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE] 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a registered sex offender and state parolee proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He raises 19 numerous claims challenging a conviction sustained in Fresno County Superior Court. As 20 discussed…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API