Legal Opinion

Joseph Petisi and James Howard Boothe v. Hans H. Rennhard and Charles R. Stephens, Jr.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided August 4, 1966No. Patent Appeal 7634PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Acting Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention to appellees Renn-hard et al., the senior party, in interference No. 92,332 between Petisi et al. application serial No. 65,584, filed October 28, 1960, for “New Tetracycline Compounds,” and Rennhard et al. application serial No. 847,867, filed October 22, 1959, the title of which does not appear in the record. 1

During the motion period appellants, Petisi et al., moved to shift the burden of proof on the basis of three prior filed applications, only one of which —…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kyrides v. AndersenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shu-Hui Chen and Vittorio Farina v. Herve Bouchard, Jean-Dominique Bourzat, and Alain CommerconCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
  3. Ritter v. Rohm & Haas CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  4. George B. Spero v. Howard J. Ringold and George RosenkranzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  5. Mikus v. WachtelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API