Legal Opinion

Danwell Corp. v. Zoning Hearing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 20, 1987No. Appeal, 589 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Landowners Dan well Corporation, Valley Forge Industries, Inc. and Asphalt Paving and Supply Company appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, dismissing their complaint in mandamus. The landowners had requested the trial court to order the Zoning Hearing Board of Plymouth Township to enter a deemed approval of their application for special exception because of the boards failure to render a decision within forty-five days of the hearing, as provided by section 908 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC). 1 We affirm.

The key…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foltz v. MonroevilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Giant Food Stores, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Petrone v. Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kuszyk v. Zoning Hearing Board of Amity TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Danwell Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Pham v. Upper Merion Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Timothy F. Pasch, Inc. v. Springettsbury Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Appeal of BuchsbaumCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API