Legal Opinion
Jamar-Mamon X v. The University of Cincinnati
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 25, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00484Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION NURIEL DIZYN JAMAR-MAMON X, Case No. 1:24-CV-484 Plaintiff, Judge Michael R. Barrett v. UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI, et al., OPINION & ORDER Defendants. This matter is before the Court on the motion for a preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff Nuriel Dizyn Jamar-Mamon X. (Doc. 2). Defendants University of Cincinnati (“UC”) and Jack Miner have responded and moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Doc. 24). Jamar-Mamon X has also moved for the undersigned’s recusal. (Doc. 32).…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.