Legal Opinion

James Valley Bank v. Nicholas

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1924No. File No. 5329PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPo'L'Ley, J.

This action was brought to recover a deficiency due on a promissory note after a sale of property under a mortgage given to secure payment of the said note. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

On the appeal two defenses are urged. The first defense is that the note provided on its face for the payment of usurious interest, and therefore is void. This defense is raised for the first time on the argument in this court. It is not pleaded in the answer, nor was it presented to the trial court on the trial, nor on the motion for a new trial, nor in this court by any assignment of error.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Black Hills Fair Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Stratton v. Interstate Fruit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Nelson v. CasparySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stratton v. Interstate Fruit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API