Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local 901

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 11, 1963No. 6050PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, Circuit Judge.

Respondent, Local 901, the Puerto Rico local of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, was found by the Board to have violated sections 8(b) (4) (i) and (ii) (C) of the National Labor Relations Act, in that it “induce[d] or encourage [d]” the employees of Valencia Baxt Express, Inc., hereinafter the employer, to engage in a strike, and “threaten [ed]” the employer, with the object of forcing the employer to recognize respondent, when another union, Seafarers International Union of North America, etc., hereinafter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brooks v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Marcus Trucking Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Superior Fireproof Door & Sash Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Dallas General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local No. 745, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Tungsten Mining Corporation v. District 50, United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers, Local 901Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API