Legal Opinion

Moffat v. City & County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1914No. 7320PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. — Hon. Greeley W. Whitford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

Defendant in error instituted proceedings under the provisions of article 4, chapter 147, Revised Statutes, • 1908, against plaintiffs in error and others, to acquire property for the purpose of opening, widening, and extending West Alameda. Avenue west. This avenue is intersected by numerous railroad tracks, and the purpose of the proceedings was to provide for the construction of an open cut subway underneath these tracks, to be used in connection with the avenue as extended, whereby grade crossings would be avoided. The title to part of the property involved, embraced in the west part of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Denver City Irrigation & Water Co. v. MiddaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  3. Anderson v. FullerSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  4. Matter of Petition of DeeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Scranton Gas & Water Co. v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. U S West Communications, Inc. v. City of LongmontSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. City & County of Denver v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Grand River Dam Authority v. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  4. Kelly v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Keller v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API