Legal Opinion
Kedra v. Nazareth Hospital
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 7, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-6125PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
Defendant Nazareth Hospital has filed a motion for partial summary judgment on Counts II and IV of plaintiffs Amended Complaint, which allege violations of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA” or the “Act”). The Hospital asserts that Kedra did not exhaust the administrative remedies available to her under the PHRA. For the following reasons, we will deny defendant’s motion.
Procedural History
Plaintiff Patricia Kedra filed her seven-count complaint on November 18, 1993. Counts II and IV of her Amended Complaint allege violations of § 955 of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Clare R. Bruffett v. Warner Communications, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- James W. Woodson v. Scott Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Kedra v. Nazareth HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Buccilli v. Timby, Brown & TimbyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Richards v. Foulke Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Marriott Corp. v. AlexanderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.