Legal Opinion

Albert v. Lust

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 11, 1946Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified so that the defendant will only be required to particularize concerning such claims of contributory negligence as it intends to assert in addition to those it may be able to develop on the cross-examination. (Murrain v. Wilson Line, Inc., 266 App. Div. 179; Captan v. Associated Transport, Inc., 269 App. Div. 936.) Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murrain v. Wilson Line, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. Captan v. Associated Transport, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945