Danton v. Mohler Barber School
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Calvin U. G-antenbein, Judge. Department 1. The Circuit Court sustained a general demurrer to the plaintiffs’ complaint and, as they refused to plead further, made an order dismissing the suit from which they have appealed. Reversed and remanded.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The two plaintiffs allege in substance that for ten years prior to the filing of the complaint they have been conducting a barber school and college in Portland, as partners, for the instruction of persons desiring to learn the barber trade; that they carried on such business under the firm name and style of “Moler Barber College” and that they registered the same' as required by Chapter 154 of the Laws of 1913. They say that this name is well known throughout Oregon, the United States and Canada, as applied to barber colleges; that they purchased from one A. B. Moler of Chicago the right to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hazelton Boiler Co. v. Hazelton Tripod Boiler Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Columbia Engineering Works v. MalloryOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Wood v. WoodOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Clark v. Ætna Iron WorksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
3Cited by6 opinions
- Federal Securities Co. v. Federal Securities Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Burke MacHinery Co. v. CopenhagenOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- The 88% STORES, INC. v. MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Umpqua Broccoli Exchange v. Um-Qua Valley Broccoli GrowersOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Starr v. HotellingOregon Supreme Court · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.