Legal Opinion

Conway v. Sonntag

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 2005No. 30246PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a claim for medical malpractice on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. We hold that under the facts in the record, the statute of limitations had not expired.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On October 5, 1999, the defendant-respondent John R. Sonntag, M.D., (Dr. Sonntag) performed cataract surgery upon the plaintiff-appellant Lynda Conway. During the procedure, he punctured the posterior portion of the lens capsule of her left eye. As a result, she suffered increased intraocular pressure in that eye,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Infanger v. City of SalmonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Dulaney v. St. Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Swallow v. Emergency Medicine of Idaho, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Lapham v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Maxwell v. Women's Clinic, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Athay v. StaceyIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Conner v. HodgesIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Elliott v. VerskaIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Dennis J. Sallaz and Marcy Fox v. Eugene (Roy) RiceIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Blake v. StarrIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API