Legal Opinion

In Re Lamp

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1961No. 35402PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

57 Wn.2d 629 (1961)

358 P.2d 966

In the Matter of ETHEL E. LAMP.

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT, Respondent,

v.

OSTROM MUSHROOM COMPANY, Appellant.[1]

No. 35402.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

January 26, 1961.

Richard C. Shanks, for appellant.

The Attorney General and John J. Champagne, Assistant, for respondent.

HILL, J.

We are here concerned with whether an employee in the canning plant and office of a company raising and canning mushrooms is entitled to unemployment compensation.

Ethel E. Lamp, who had been employed by the Ostrom Mushroom Company since 1944,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. GooleyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Williams v. Steamship Mutual Underwriting Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State Ex Rel. Evans v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Allen v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. City of Walla Walla v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brookover Feed Yards, Inc. v. Carlton, CommissionerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. West Foods, Inc. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Vicwood Meridian Partnership v. Skagit Sand & GravelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Vicwood Meridian Partnership v. Skagit Sand & GravelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API