Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gates v. New York Life Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1969No. Docket 5,198Published

1DissentLevin, P. J.

The plaintiffs, beneficiaries of a life insurance policy, commenced this action to recover a double indemnity payable upon accidental death. The majority affirm a directed verdict for the defendant on the ground that all the testimony showed that the insured, William R. Gates, set in motion a course of events likely to result in death and, thus, his death was not accidental.

*27Both the majority and I are in agreement that if Gates did, in fact, arm himself and fire at the police officers who had stopped him, his death by a gunshot fired by one of the officers was not accidental.1 I cannot agree,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In Re Wood EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Utter v. Travelers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. People v. ThomasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Ruhala v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API