Legal Opinion

Munnerlyn v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 3, 2018No. CR–87–61PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobin F. Wynne, Associate Justice

Petitioner Robert Munnerlyn has filed a motion to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for a writ of audita querela, or alternatively, for leave to file a postconviction petition in the trial court pursuant to Rule 37.2(a) (1986) of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure. Because a writ of audita querela is indistinguishable from a writ of error coram nobis, Munnerlyn's request for audita querela relief is treated as a petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a writ of error coram nobis. See Pitts v. State , 2016 Ark. 345, 501 S.W.3d 803…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  3. JIMMY SMITH v. STATE OF ARKANSASSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  4. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Willie Hutcherson v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API