Munnerlyn v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtRobin F. Wynne, Associate Justice
Petitioner Robert Munnerlyn has filed a motion to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for a writ of audita querela, or alternatively, for leave to file a postconviction petition in the trial court pursuant to Rule 37.2(a) (1986) of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure. Because a writ of audita querela is indistinguishable from a writ of error coram nobis, Munnerlyn's request for audita querela relief is treated as a petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a writ of error coram nobis. See Pitts v. State , 2016 Ark. 345, 501 S.W.3d 803…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
- Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
- JIMMY SMITH v. STATE OF ARKANSASSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
- Willie Hutcherson v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.