Hall v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtKaren R. Baker, Associate Justice
Petitioner Androus Hall brings this petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court so that he may file a petition for writ of error coram nobis in his criminal case. In the petition, Hall contends that there were defects in both the trial and the appellate processes, and the evidence was insufficient to sustain the judgment. Because Hall does not state a ground for the writ, the petition is denied.
I. Nature of the Writ
The petition for leave to proceed in the trial court is necessary because the trial court can entertain a petition for writ of error coram nobis after a judgment has been…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- State v. LarimoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
- Charles Edward Jones v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
- Terry Swanigan v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
- Patrick Eugene Dobbins v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2022