Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ameristeel Corp. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 26, 2001No. 00-3366Unknown

1DissentBecker, Chief Judge

It is surprising that thirty-seven years after John Wiley & Sons v. Livingston, 376 U.S. 543, 84 S.Ct. 909, 11 L.Ed.2d 898 (1964), in which the Supreme Court first tackled the issue of successorship liability in labor cases, the law in this area is still unsettled. Wiley established that the notion of “substantial continuity in the identity of the business enterprise” is the principal criterion for determining successorship liability, and held that, in appropriate circumstances, successor employers can be required to arbitrate with their employees’ union under the terms of the collective…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State Oil Co. v. KhanSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API