Legal Opinion

Virgil v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1995No. 21437PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

This is a civil appeal from a district court order affirming a magistrate’s suspension of Michael Virgil’s driver’s license for failure to submit to an evidentiary breath test. Virgil argues that the license suspension notice used by the city of Twin Falls did not conform to Idaho’s implied consent statute, I.C. § 18-8002. We agree and reverse the magistrate’s suspension order.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On February 13, 1994, Officer Mark Marvin of the Twin Falls Police Department stopped Virgil after observing him driving at 1:28 a.m. with his headlights off and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of GriffithsIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. AnkneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Matter of GoerigIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Matter of BeemIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Head v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. Matilda K. KlingIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Cunningham v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Head v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Head v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API