Legal Opinion

Schulte v. Starritt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 3, 1940No. 28825PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

Plaintiff Starritt brought this action against defendants to recover possession of certain real estate. Defendants answered by general denial, and at the trial contended, and offered evidence tending to prove, that plaintiff held the legal title as trustee for defendants. From a verdict and judgment against them, defendants appeal.

1. The first contention of defendants is that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that defendants had the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that plaintiff held title to the property as trustee for them. They argue that under section 593,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Payne v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  2. Blanchard v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Hutchison v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Jordan v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Moore v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. DEPT. OF SECURITIES EX REL. FAUGHT v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  2. Oklahoma Department of Securities ex rel. Faught v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  3. Jeffers v. EdgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Starritt v. SchulteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF SECURITIES EX REL. FAUGHT v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API