Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 1, 1926No. 6 Div. 885PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

Pursuant to section 7311 of the Code, the Judges of the Court of Appeals have referred to this court the following questions:

“The petitioner in this case files his petition for writ of habeas corpus, under chapter 151 of the Code of 1923, and, from an order denying the relief sought, he appeals to this court.
“Upon the general proposition that the remedy by appeal is purely statutory, that the order in a habeas corpus proceeding, under chapter 151 of the Code, was not a final judgment or decree of a court, but is an order or judgment of the judge hearing the petition, and that chapter 151 of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex parte CroomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  2. Ex parte City Council of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  3. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. State v. TowerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. Tillman v. WaltersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chisolm v. CrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Ex Parte WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Simmons v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Gayle v. GayleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Ex Parte SullivanNevada Supreme Court · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API