Legal Opinion
Reese v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 18, 2009No. A09A0344PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.
On appeal from his conviction for driving under the influence (DUD and other crimes, Jason Reese argues that the evidence was insufficient as to per se DUI and that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for mistrial and when it sentenced him. We affirm his conviction but vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing.
“On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, with the defendant no longer enjoying a presumption of innocence.” Reese v. State, 270 Ga. App. 522, 523 (607 SE2d 165) (2004). We neither…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Yarbrough v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
3Cited by2 opinions
- Belans v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Tyson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009