New Jersey Builders Ass'n v. Mayor & Township Committee of Bernards Township
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Per curiam
The determination under review is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge D’Annunzio in his formal written opinion for the Law Division dated February 25, 1985, 211 N.J.Super. 290. We decline to order the judgment under review limited to prospective applicability only since it neither announces a new rule of law nor represents a departure from existing law. See State v. Burstein, 85 N.J. 394, 403 (1981). In our view, plaintiffs have demonstrated a sufficient stake and adverse interest as to entitle them to sue under New Jersey’s liberal rules of standing. See Crescent Pk.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. BursteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Crescent Pk. Tenants Assoc. v. Realty Eq. Corp. of NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Nj Bldrs Ass'n v. Mayor and Township Committee of Bernards Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
3Cited by13 opinions
- New Jersey Builders Ass'n v. Mayor of Bernards TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- JEN ELECTRIC, INC. v. County of EssexSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Lampley v. Davis MacH. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- COURIER-POST v. County of CamdenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- County of Ocean v. Zekaria RealtyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.