Legal Opinion

Claim of Pioli v. Crouse-Hinds Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant is a molder. The employer is engaged in the business of making electrical parts. In the work claimant used a ladle attached to a rod or handle three and one-half feet long. He dipped the ladle into a pot of molten metal and then twisted around to pour the metal into molds. This was his regular day by day course of operations. On February 23, 1951, while in the act of pouring off he “got like a shock here in my neck” and “it started aching in my back.” He stopped work. There is medical opinion that he suffered a…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Middleton v. Coxsackie Correctional FacilityNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Furlong v. O'HearneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
  3. Claim of Greensmith v. Franklin National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  4. Claim of Meyer v. A. Hollander & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API