Legal Opinion

People v. Neaton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1940No. Docket No. 113, Calendar No. 40,550PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPottek, J.

Defendant was • arrested, tried, and convicted of breaking and entering a certain pool-, room in the nighttime, then and there to commit a felony. The offense charged was a second offense and it was so alleged in the information. Defendant appeals, claiming there was no evidence, direct or circumstantial, connecting him with the commission of the crime; and that, where the defendant admitted the commission of the crime charged as a first offense, the trial court erred in permitting plaintiff to introduce testimony as to commission of the first offense on the ground it had the effect of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CostelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. State v. CreightonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. McHenry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
  4. Commonwealth v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  5. Trogdon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. ChismMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. MacPhersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API