Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bracewell v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 10, 1931No. 40464Published

1Dissent

Morling, J.,

(dissenting) — It must be found on this record that immediately prior to April 10, 1929, the Farmers National Bank, or the plaintiffs as its trustees, had a cause of action against the defendant on promissory notes upon which plaintiffs could then have maintained this action; that no discharge in bankruptcy has been granted and there is no defense to the action. On the date mentioned defendant was by the Federal court adjudged to be a bankrupt. By such adjudication all the defendant’s non-exempt property passed into the jurisdiction of the court of bankruptcy and vested in the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  2. Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Hill v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Wolf v. StixSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API