Legal Opinion

Gorst v. Wagner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 20, 1993No. 73660PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

Claire C. Gorst, appellant and plaintiff below, appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for new trial and the trial court’s imposition of attorney fees and costs against Gorst in 1989. On appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed both the denial of new trial and the imposition of fees and costs. Certio-rari was granted to consider only whether the fees and costs were properly awarded. Because we find that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding attorney fees and costs over the limit allowed by 23 O.S.Supp. 1986, § 103, we vacate the portion of the Court of Appeals’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Beard v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. Dean Bailey Olds, Inc. v. Richard Preston Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Sooner Trailer Manufacturing Co. v. GayCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. In the Matter of Estate of FieldsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API