Legal Opinion
Dean Bailey Olds, Inc. v. Richard Preston Motor Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 28, 2000No. 92,141PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WATT, J.
1 1 The issues in this appeal are (1) whether the trial court erred in granting attorneys' fees for defendant, Richard Preston Motor Company, Inc., and against plaintiff, Dean Bailey Olds, Inc and, if the trial court did not err, (2) whether the attorneys' fees award was excessive.
T2 There were originally other parties to the suit, none of which are parties to this appeal. Because the issues before us involve only plaintiff and defendant, our statement of the facts and procedural background will ignore the fact that Preston's surety company and a dealer who had owned the car in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Suiter v. Mitchell Motor Coach Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Bullard v. Grisham Construction Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Gorst v. WagnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Miller's Apple Valley Chevrolet Olds-Geo, Incorporated, a West Virginia Corporation v. Mark GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spencer v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Geyer Bros. Equipment Co. v. Standard Resources, L.L.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Dean Bailey Olds, Inc. v. Richard Preston Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000