Legal Opinion

State v. Ryun

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 11, 1997No. 95C22937; CA A93771Published

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Defendant appeals her conviction for assault in the third degree following a stipulated facts trial. She contends that the trial court erred in holding that criminal liability-attaches under the facts of this case. We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proved beyond a reasonable doubt, State v. Cunningham, 320 Or 47, 63, 880 P2d 431 (1994), cert den 514 US 1005, 115 S Ct 1317, 131 L Ed 2d 198 (1995); State v. King, 307 Or 332, 339, 768 P2d 391 (1989), and affirm.

On July…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. PetersenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API