Legal Opinion

Jackiewicz v. United Illuminating Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 28, 1927PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The trial court ordered the verdict set aside conditionally on three grounds, (1) that there had been no evidence of pecuniary loss to the plaintiff from loss of earnings of his minor son, (2) that the instruction of the court upon this subject was inadequate, and (3) that the verdict in favor of the minor son had probably included the amount awarded the parent in this case for loss of the son’s earnings during his minority and hence was excessive.

Nothing appears in the record which enables us to know, or which enabled the trial court to know, that the jury included, in the action brought in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Stotler ex rel. Stotler v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Birkett v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Tomlinson v. Town of DerbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  5. Smith v. WhittleseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Chase v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  3. Ball v. T. J. Pardy Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Feldman v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
  5. Marcil v. A. H. Merriman & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API