Logan v. Moore
New York Supreme Court
Action by one Logan against Moore & Schley, a co-partnership, and others, to readjust the accounts of a syndicate. Defendants demur on the grounds “that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against said defendants, or any of .them, and that sixteen specified causes of action have been improp-' erly united.”
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
Demurrer to the complaint by the five defendants who compose the firm of Moore & Schley, and by two other defendants,'Henry H. Rogers and William Rockefeller, separately. The ■grounds of demurrer are: (1) That the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against said defendants, •or any of them; (2) that 16 specified causes of action have been improperly united.
' The action appears to be brought to obtain a readjustment of the accounts of a certain syndicate, which was organized to consolidate into one company seven gaslight companies in the city of Brooklyn.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marvin v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Marston v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Freer v. . DentonNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Bass v. . ComstockNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Porter v. Union Blue Stone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
3Cited by1 opinion
- New York Life Insurance v. HamiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1906