Bass v. . Comstock
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The demurrer in this case was properly stricken out and judgment given for the plaintiffs. There is no misjoinder of causes of action. There are two causes of action upon two promissory notes well stated in the complaint, but the accusation against the complaint, as I understand it, is, that these causes of action are not separately stated, as required by section 167 of the Code. This section does declare that the causes of action must be separately stated, but the better opinion seems to be that such causes of action are not improperly united, simply because they are not separately stated by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harrison v. VoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Peckham v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1854
- Dorman v. KellamNew York Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by12 opinions
- Goldberg v. . UtleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- First Nat. Bank of Tishomingo v. IngleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Freer v. . DentonNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- House v. LowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Harris v. EldridgeNew York Supreme Court · 1879
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.