Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Kent

California Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1911No. L.A. No. 2884PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This was a contest of a will before probate, and from a decree refusing its admission to probate and from an order denying the motion of the proponent of the will for a new trial these appeals are prosecuted.

The alleged will does not appear anywhere in the record on appeal, and the only matters concerning its execution or as to its contents are contained in the petition for its probate. It appears from that petition that the deceased died in the county of Los Angeles on August 30, 1904, a resident thereof. She left no property in California, but left a small tract of land in the state of Ohio…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McFadyen v. RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of PitcairnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Honsa v. HospodarskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Estate of BraueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. In Re Cummings' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Gray v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API