Jones v. Karline

The action is for breach of an obligation claimed to have been assumed by defendant, which is a Czechoslovakian bank, to reimburse plaintiffs for loss sustained by them in carrying certain “ contracts ” for lard and ribs for one litis.

The first ground assigned is that the papers do not sufficiently show the damage. The contention of the defendant that the 12th paragraph of the complaint is a mere conclusion of law would be sound were it not for Exhibit C annexed to and incorporated therein, which furnishes some allegation of fact as to the damage. There is, therefore, no warrant for the…