Legal Opinion

Smith v. Colby

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 29, 1884PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Allen, J.

This is an action, upon an account annexed, for goods, sold and delivered. The answer sets up the breach of a special contract to deliver goods. To prove the contract, the defendant offered a memorandum signed by himself, in connection with two letters written by the plaintiffs to the defendant. The presiding judge ruled that the contract alleged in the answer was not proved by the memorandum and letters. We think that the learned judge erred in this ruling. The letters, on their face, sufficiently refer to the memorandum. The memorandum was produced by the plaintiffs on the call of the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walker v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Cochrane v. Justice Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  3. Spiegel v. LowensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. Spence v. LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  5. Delaware Mills, Inc. v. Carpenter Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API