Legal Opinion
Blanco v. Mukasey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 3, 2008No. 06-71385PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FISHER; Concurrence by Judge PREGERSON.
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
Mario Jorge Blanco petitions for review of a final order of removal, arguing that the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) erred in holding that he is an inadmissible alien who is not eligible for any discretionary relief. The BIA found Blanco to be ineligible for adjustment of status because he made a false claim to citizenship when he was detained at the border, and ineligible for cancellation of removal because he had been convicted of crimes involving moral turpitude. Because the BIA’s moral turpitude finding…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Miguel Angel Iturribarria v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Jose Lopez-Vasquez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Santiago-Rodriguez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Nehad v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- D-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011
- Ruben Ceron v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.