Legal Opinion

Miner v. Hess

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1868PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Wkit of Ekrob to the Circuit Court of McDonough county; the Hon. Chauncey L. Higkbee, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Breese

This was a bill in chancery, instituted in the McDonough Circuit Court by Abraham Hess against Clarissa Miner, to correct a mistake in the description of a lot of land in the town of Bushnell, leased by the defendant to the complainant for three years, at the yearly rent of one hundred and twenty-five dollars. The lease bears date December 13, 1861, and describes the premises as follows: “ Twenty-four feet of the south half of lot 4, block 33, Bushnell, Illinois.”

It is claimed in the bill of complainant that the premises should have been described as, “ Twenty-four feet off of the south side…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Southard v. . CurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Christopher & Tenth Street Railroad v. Twenty-third Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Winston v. BurnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  4. Christopher St. R. Co. v. . 23d St. R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Sloan v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API