Legal Opinion

Beehive State Bank v. Rosquist

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1971No. 11951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUCKETT, Justice.

This is the second appeal in this case. The first appeal in this matter was by the plaintiff from a summary judgment entered by the court below in favor of the in-tervener. After remand and a trial in the court below, judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the intervener, and the intervener now appeals to this court.

The plaintiff, Beehive State Bank, was a judgment creditor of lia R. Painter and *63during her lifetime caused a writ of garnishment to issue, attaching a joint checking account standing in the name of Ila R. Painter and Fred L. Painter, her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. McMurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Union Properties, Inc. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Beehive State Bank v. RosquistUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Neill v. RoyceUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Braegger v. LovelandUtah Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pagano v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Beehive State Bank v. RosquistUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Carter v. KingsfordUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Carter v. KingsfordUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hardy v. HendricksonUtah Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API