Legal Opinion

People v. Buchel

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1956No. Crim. 2665PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury upon an amended information which accused him of a violation of section 288 of the Penal Code in that he did “wilfully and lewdly commit a lewd and lascivious act upon and with the body and certain parts and members thereof of George M. Buchel, a child under the age of fourteen years, to wit, of the age of thirteen years, with the intent of arousing, appealing to, and gratifying the lust, passion and sexual desires of the said defendant.” Probation was denied and defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied also. Judgment was pronounced and defendant has…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. People v. AnthonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. People v. BeltranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. People v. AsavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. People v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. CovertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. MalloyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. People v. CooleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API