Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Reichart

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 22, 1938No. 13747PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

Appellant Anderson sued appellee Reicln-art for damages occasioned by a collision between the motor vehicle driven by appellant with that driven by appellee, and also sought to recover as against appellee’s employer. Appellee by cross-action sought to recover damages from appellant and appellant’s employer, who owned the motor vehicle driven by appellant.

The case being tried to a jury, in answer to special issues submitted the jury found that appellee was not guilty of negligence, but that appellant was negligent; that ap-pellee was injured and suffered damages to his person…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mexican Central Railway Co. v. MittenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Taylor County v. OldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Ara v. RutlandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  4. Ara v. RutlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Finck Cigar Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. A. B. C. Storage & Moving Co. v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Standard Paving Co. v. PyleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Paul v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Norris Bros., Inc. v. MattinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Scott v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API