Ara v. Rutland
Texas Commission of Appeals
Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Fourth Supreme Judicial District. Action by J. W. Rutland against Charles Ara. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals, which affirméd (172 S. W. 993), and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSadler, J.
The sole question before us
is whether there is any evidence authorizing the findings of fact by the court sustaining the true measure of damage and supporting the judgment for defendant in error. For a general statement of the case, see the opinion of the honorable Court of Civil Appeals in 172 S. W. 993.
[1] On the trial, the witnesses testified to the market value of the shoes, charged to have been damaged, immediately before and immediately after the injury, based on cost and carriage. To this testimony of the witnesses the objection was made at the time it was offered t]iat it did not…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ara v. RutlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
3Cited by23 opinions
- Flynn v. Pan American Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
- Foley Bros. Dry Goods Co. v. SettegastCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Anderson v. ReichartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Taylor County v. OldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- City of Brady v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.