Faekler v. Wright
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
The only question raised by appellant which is worthy of consideration is, whether the court below had jurisdiction of the subject-matter. The complaint refers to the copy of the mortgage attached thereto for a description of the property. It is described therein as follows: “The real property situate in the Eancho Santiago de Santa Ana, county of Los Angeles, state of California, and described as follows, to wit: The northwest quarter of lot No. 3, of block C, containing ten acres of land in the A. B. Chapman tract, according to the survey thereof made by Frank Lecouvrer in the year 1870,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Loranger v. NadeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Rogers v. CadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Mullan v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Harrington v. GoldsmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.