Legal Opinion
Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 30, 2004No. 02-2048PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Gerald T. Martin and Juana M. Martin (Martins) sought an award of attorney’s fees and expenses pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) from Franklin Capital Corporation and Century-National Insurance Company (defendants) after this court determined defendants should not have re moved, the instant action to federal court. The district court denied the Martins’ request for fees and expenses, and they appeal. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
I
In September 1996, the Martins filed a lawsuit against defendants in New Mexico state court. On their behalf…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Barbara Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Company, Farrar Oilfield Service and Equipment Co., and Tri-State Oil Services, Inc., Tri-State Oil Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Cheryl Cohen, on Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated v. Office Depot, Inc., a Florida CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Topeka Housing Authurity v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Christensen v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2017
- City of Neodesha, Kansas v. BP CORP. NORTH AMERICADistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2005
- Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.