Legal Opinion

Bright v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 3, 2003PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

SENIOR JUDGE MIRARCHI, JR.

Before this Court are the preliminary objections of the Department of Corrections (Department) and the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board), (collectively Respondents), to the petition for review in the nature of an action in mandamus filed by Freddie Bright (Bright), an inmate at the State Correctional Institute at Mahanoy. We sustain the preliminary objections and dismiss the petition for review for failure to state a valid cause of action.

The relevant facts alleged by the parties are as follows. Bright was incarcerated on robbery charges…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HollawellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Doxsey v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Fajohn v. Com., Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. MerigrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Saunders v. Commonwealth, Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Evans v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. Collins v. Commonwealth, Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Evans v. SECRETARY PENN. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. Stallsmith v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Com. ex rel. Jacobs, A. v. Clark, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API