Legal Opinion
Railroad v. Dies
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 1892PublishedCited by 11 opinions
FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Davidson County. ~W. K. McAlister, J.
1Opinion of the CourtLurtoN, J.
Mr. Lies shipped from Nashville a car-load of live stock, destined to San Antonio, Texas. The shipment was upon special terms, contained in a printed live-stock contract. One of the stipulations in this contract was in these words:
“And it is further understood and agreed that said party of the second part has examined and found in good order the car or cars provided by the said party of the first part for the transportation of said animals, and hereby accepts the same, and agrees that they are, as thus provided, suitable and sufficient for said purpose.”
There was evidence tending to show that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pennsylvania Co. v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. RankinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Bonfiglio v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Kime v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Washington Horse Exchange v. L. & N. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. FairbanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.