Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Herman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 12, 1910No. 16,009PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Chautauqua district court; Granville P. Aikman, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment in ejectment and partition. The chief controversy relates to ownership. The appellant claims under a tax-deed holder. His opponents claim under the delinquent landowner. The appellant also has a share of the property independent of the tax deed, but the tax title must be sustained to work a reversal of the judgment of the district court.

The land formerly belonged to Hester A. Spurlock. It was school land, and was sold on contract to her brother, Owen P. Spurlock, in 1872. In 1873 she took an assignment of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Lawrence v. KillamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. Woodman v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  3. Phillips v. ReitzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  4. Wiswell v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Cornell University v. ParkinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McGill v. McGillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Dusenbery v. BidwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Rooney v. McDermottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Brantingham v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
  5. Glenn v. CallahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API