Legal Opinion

Durham v. Anka Research Ltd.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1978No. C-77454PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

This appeal raises several questions about the statute of limitations for personal injury (R. C. 2305.10), the “saving clause” applicable when a person is out of state (R. C. 2305.15), and the suspension of the statute of limitations during the disability of an “infant” (R. C. 2305.16) whose age of majority is reduced by legislative action (R. C. 3109.01).

Plaintiff brought suit against Anka Research Limited (Anka), the manufacturer of an intrauterine device which she claims was the cause of personal injuries. Her suit was dismissed on defendant’s motion and on appeal she assigns three errors.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Mills v. Whitehouse Trucking Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Melnyk v. Cleveland ClinicOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Seeley v. Expert, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Mary Grooms v. Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Velotta v. Leo Petronzio Landscaping, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Leichliter v. Nat'l City Bank of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Goad v. Cuyahoga County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Boll v. GriffithOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Barile v. University of VirginiaOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API